A more comprehensive rebuttle to Pastor Jakes can be found at this link.
I have seen some Adventists characterize Bishop T. D. Jakes’ sermon as an attack on both Adventism and the Sabbath.I have heard other Adventists who saw the sermon as Jakes promoting the Sabbath in some way. I conclude that it is paradoxically both a notable attempt to find relevance in the Sabbath commandment and an attack specifically on the Seventh-day Sabbath. The title of the sermon is RSVP and can be found at this link.
Jakes Initial look at the Sabbath
Jakes quotes an Old Testament passage that states that we are to “bear no burden on the Sabbath day.†Jakes, in an insightful move, applies this to our own contemporary context. Specifically, the Sabbath is about freedom. We should let all of our burdens go. Jakes here sees in the Sabbath a symbol of God’s desire to free us of all of our burdens. This helpful idea is pervasive in the sermon. I think that we Seventh Day Sabbatarians aught to look, as Jakes as done, for ways to tie the Sabbath to the basic Gospel and help us gain a glimpse of what God has done and is doing for and in us. Jakes should be commended at attempting to marshal the doctrine of the Sabbath in support of the goal of helping people live Christ-centered lives. However, Jakes undercuts his support of the Sabbath by attacking the same Sabbath.
Sabbath is Saturday
I do appreciate that Jakes correctly identifies the Sabbath as Saturday. Although he does briefly talk about the New Testament supposedly pointing to the Sabbath as Sunday. Presumably because of the resurrection. He does not provide any substantiation.
Later, Jakes talks about keeping all the days as a Sabbath.
However one cannot keep all the days, at least not as a Sabbath. The Sabbath requires a total disengagement from the world and participation in the coming kingdom. You cannot do that on every day of the week. Now Jakes would argue that we can if the “rest†is a “rest†in Jesus for salvation and not a 24 hour time period. We shall return to this later.
Sabbath past and future
Jakes has some gems that are very helpful to Sabbatarians. He looks at the fourth commandment and sees it both as a pointer to the past and the future. The word “remember†refers to a past event and the “keep it holy†refers to a present reality. Here Jakes sees in the Sabbath a past and a present reality. In addition, I would add to Jakes helpful insight that there is a future dimension as well. In any case, Jakes correctly notes that the Sabbath is more than just the 24 hour day where we go to church, however none of this precludes a 24 hour day to celebrate what Jakes has told us is the real meaning of the Sabbath. I would argue that one needs a 24 hour day to fully experience the present reality of God’s future unencumbered by daily necessities like work.
The Rest of God
Jakes sees that in the Genesis account that God created everything and then rested. Humanity was simply to enter into that rest for all was done. However when sin entered into the world, it was then that God’s rest was broken. Thus, the commandment is telling us to “remember that sin broke rest.â€
It is here that Jakes makes an interesting connection. In the beginning God created and and said it was all good. Then God rested. Then sin entered and broke God’s rest. God gave the Sabbath to the Jews to help them remember that sin broke the rest. Then Jesus came and died on the cross. Jesus once again says, “It is finished†and goes to set on the right hand of God. Now the Sabbath is fulfilled in Jesus’ rest.
Jakes then asks, “Why care about a shadow that simply pointed to the rest of Jesus when you have the reality?”
Then Jakes gives an illustration. Jakes spoke of a shadow being cast at his wedding as the light from the candles hit his body. He then asks, “Why would someone take the shadow when someone could have the man?†Thus, Jakes sees Sabbatarians holding on to the shadow and not the reality which is Jesus Christ.
The Problem
There are a few problems with this argument. First, Jakes assumes that the Sabbath cannot be a symbol of the rest that Jesus gives. Why can’t our keeping of the Sabbath today symbolize our rest in Jesus? Why does he assume that one can only have the shadow (Sabbath) (I do not think that the Sabbath is a shadow, I am just using Jakes’ terminology) or Jesus? Can’t one have both the Sabbath and Jesus?
Why does Jakes argue that the Sabbath goes back to creation and yet it is a Jewish ordinance? It is either a creational ordinance or a Jewish one, but it cannot be both. And finally, why does Jakes seem to assume that the celebration of a 24 hour Sabbath is at odds with the belief that the day also points to rest in Jesus?
Finally, I think that his wedding illustration is helpful. How would Jakes’ wife respond if his wife told him to remember the day of their wedding and he either chose to forget it or said that “every day was his anniversary?†The simple fact is, as Jakes stated, the Sabbath is “technically’ Saturday.
Very Helpful exposition of the Sabbath
Jakes then continues his helpful discussion of the Sabbath as a symbol of our rest in Jesus. He argues that we are to fight to enter into the rest of God. We are to rest from our efforts to be saved, rest from our efforts to become children of God. Rest in the fact that we are children of God. The labor is to enter the rest. And then he moves back to the first issue of how we must let go of our baggage that separates us from God and others. Jesus is calling us to enter into the rest. The Sabbath is a symbol of that rest.
Conclusion
I think taking everything into consideration, T. D. Jakes presents a good sermon on the Sabbath. I certainly have issues with his seeking to do away with the Seventh-day Sabbath, but his exposition of the meaning of the Sabbath for modern day Christians can be helpful to all Sabbatarians as we seek to explain the importance of the doctrine. I think that many of us need to do some contemplation of the importance of the principle of Sabbath as Jakes has done here. However, I only wish that Jakes would begin to fully keep the day that God has set aside to contemplate all that Jakes has so eloquently described.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.










Are you kidding me? “Good?” Maybe you need to go back and look up the word good, brother, because that sermon was anything but! It has set the Movement back almost a hundred years. You can’t possibly think that his oration of the Sabbath is beneficial to any sincere seeker of truth. Furthermore Isaiah said, “Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil!” (Isaiah 5:20) It was EVIL for it teaches people to depart from Biblical Truth! I believe you too are so enamored with the man that you are blinded by his lack of biblical scrutiny. We are suppose to lift up the standard not circumvent it. Christ can not be separated from the Sabbath. Keep the Faith! And don’t be blinded by the artificial “light!”
I doubt you read my article sir, thank you for you comments, but please read the whole article before commenting…
Response to TD Jakes found here:
http://adventist-defense-league.blogspot.com/2008/12/response-to-td-jakes.html
i think what jakes is saying is not true in the sense that the sabbath is the shadow and the fact that GOD gave the sabbath to the jews to remmember that rest was broken,the sabbath is a symbol of rest in it men shall rejoice and give praise to the creator it is a covanent between GOD and his people the bible says in genesis 2;2 he rested from all his work and blessed the seventh day so it is up to men whether they want 2 follow the true god or follow jakes theory because jakes is totally missing the point with all his myths he’s only deviating the children of GOD from the real truth by which they might be saved.
Yes…the Sabbath was never a shadow as you have noted. In addition, however, Jakes’ argument that the day is not important because it is more important to have the person than the day, does not prove what he wants it to prove. In the article, I use that argument to show that he does not even believe it for his wife would not be happy if he ignored their anniversary because he “had her and not the day.” As I have argued in the article…
Surely if you have read the whole article you would not be under the impression that I agree with Jakes on the issue of Sabbath? Please read the whole article…
well certainly im under the impression u agree. my question is what is the purpose of the sabbath to u as an individual because clearly you are telling everybody that they should read the article thoughroughly please make your views very clear on the sabbath that is made for men and not men made for the sabbath.
I still don’t’ understand…Are you saying that you are under the impression that I agree with Jakes views on the Sabbath as not being legitimate? Certainly one can disagree with my article…that is find, but I find it hard to believe one has read this article and come to the conclusion that I agree with Jakes that the Seventh day Sabbath is illegitimate…That’s why I assumed you hadn’t read the article…perhaps I misread you…can you expand on your statement?
I really find it interesting that the original poster disagrees with my article and then makes some of the same arguments that I make in it…That is why I assumed he had not read it…
God bless…
What was the first test that was given to Israelites when they came out of Egypt? God rained down manna for six days and on the seventh day did rained down none (Ex 16:4-28).
Now why did God do that? What was He trying to teach them? Trust! They were to trust and have full assurance and the Sabbath was the test of their trust or full assurance. Why so? On the seventh day, they were to trust in the provision that was given to them on the sixth day.
How much was it given to them on the sixth day? Double portion (Ex. 16:22).
Here is the facinating part. Jesus comes along and says “I am the bread (John 6:48-49) – I am the manna that came down from heaven. So Jesus picks up this analogy. If He is the bread of life, then we can expect something would happen on a sixth day in the life of Jesus. What happened on a Friday with Jesus? He was crucified!
So get this now – The cross of Christ was the double portion; the more than abounding blessings that God had given to us and now what comes the day after Jesus died? It is the Sabbath. Do we realize that the Sabbath is a test to see whether we trust in the full provision made for us at the cross?
Every Sabbath we keep, we are saying, I trust in the full provision made for me at the cross. I will rest in him. That means, I am resting from my own works (Heb. 4:10). What are my own works? The works of the flesh. The Sabbath reveals our ultimate trust in the sacrifice of Christ. To deny Sabbath is to deny the cross. Denying the cross is Anti-cross and Anti-Christ is Anti-cross.
I like your pulling the cross in with the Sabbath and use of Hebrews. As soon as I get permission, I will post this as a full post so that everyone can see it soon…